Posts tagged #Donald Trump

AOC TV: Millennial Couple Plans To Launch The Wokest Netflix-Like Service In America

A Detroit couple that helped AOC win her Congressional seat plan to launch the wokest Netflix-like streaming service in America.

Means TV will be an internet-only streaming service that will offer subscribers access for $10 per month to “anti-capitalist” and “pro-worker” socialist programming including talk shows, comedy sketches, and on-the-ground reporting.

So basically, imagine if Bernie Sanders and AOC had a TV network. This is what it would look like.

I find it very capitalist of them to offer monthly subscriptions to their content in order to make a profit so they can stay in business.  Sounds like something Donald Trump would do.

The streaming service is the creation of Naomi Burton, 29, and Nick Hayes, 22, that produced a campaign video for the Ocasio-Cortez campaign.

Their goal is to attract millennials and Generation Z with their socialist message.

The couple credited Bernie Sanders campaign for President helping them to get woke.

Currently, the streaming service is seeking donations to help get the service started with a planned late 2019 launch.

With so many young Americans flirting with the ideas of socialism and with the couple having access to AOC’s millions of followers on Twitter, this video streaming service has a chance to attract an audience.

This potential new streaming service is a good example of a point I made earlier that the church and Christians need to produce video content if they want to reach young Americans with a positive message. Read that article here.

###

Dr. Chad Whittle holds a doctoral degree in mass communication and is the host of “A Whittle Bit of Commentary.” Subscribe today to his podcast on Apple Podcasts, iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher, TuneIn, and Google Play. Read his daily column at ChadWhittle.com and follow him on Twitter and Facebook.

 

 

 

 

Chad at 'The Stream': Which Democrat Will Win the Twitter Primary to Face the Tweeter-in-Chief in 2020?

The 2020 primary is underway on the Democrat side of the aisle with almost every Democrat in America planning or considering launching a bid for the nomination. It will be interesting to watch the cable networks try to fit all of the Democrats onto the same stage for a debate.

We live in a new era in presidential politics thanks to social media and partially to Donald Trump, who used Twitter and other social media to his advantage in 2016.

The traditional way of winning the White House is to knock on doors, kiss babies, and hold campaign rallies in swing states. While these activities are still helpful and necessary, there is another component that is just as important, if not more important in modern politics: winning the social media primary.

Read the rest from Chad’s latest published article here at The Stream

Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz Wants To Be The Ross Perot Of 2020 And Help Trump Win

Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz has all but officially announced his run for the White House in 2020. This is the best thing that could happen to Donald Trump. It’s Ross Perot all over again, but this time it’ll help the Republicans and not hurt them.

When Ross Perot ran his failed independent campaign in 1992, he took votes away from George H.W. Bush and gave us Bill Clinton.

If Schultz goes through with his campaign in 2020, it’ll do nothing but hurt the Democrats because he is no doubt a left-leaning Democrat. Just examine the values of Starbucks under his leadership, and it’ll give you an idea about his worldview. If he goes through with running, it doesn’t matter which candidate the Democrats put up against Trump; it almost guarantees Trump gets reelected and this is especially true if they run a weak candidate again like Hillary Clinton.

Starbucks is a corporate brand not well liked among conservatives, and their former CEO running will not take votes away from Trump. If it was the CEO of Hobby Lobby, that’s a different story.

This is the worst news for the Democrat Party since election night when Trump was announced the winner. Perot received almost 20% of the vote in 1992. If Schultz gets a similar percentage of the vote, it’s panic time at MSNBC.

 ###

Sign up today for Chad’s FREE newsletter to receive his weekly column and “A Whittle Bit of Commentary” podcast delivered to your inbox.

Future Political Power Belongs To Those That Tweet. Social Media is the Daisy Ad of 21st Century Politics

This may come as a surprise to many, but President Trump and Barack Obama have one thing in common when it comes to how they won the White House: Twitter. Unlike their competition, both men understood our modern culture and how important and influential social media is. This is something John McCain, Mitt Romney or Hillary Clinton never understood.

McCain, Romney, and Clinton all ran campaigns that would’ve had a better chance of success about 30 years ago. Each candidate never focused their main media efforts on social media. They instead went with a traditional campaign by hitting the campaign trail and talking with local residents, buying TV ad time, participating in debates and scheduling interviews on cable news shows. I’m not saying you shouldn’t still do those things for the 2020 election because each is still important to the success of your campaign. However, none of those efforts can drive the conversation about your campaign like social media can.

Looking at the ages of McCain, Romney, and Clinton compared to Obama you could simply say it’s just a generational thing that the younger Obama knew and understood more about social media’s power than his Baby Boomer opponents. However, 72-year-old Trump blows up that argument.

Like Obama, Trump’s team had a keen understanding on not just the power and influence of social media but how to use it to control the narrative and drive the national conversation. No one could ever be better at this than Trump. He is the Twitter master.

With one simple meme or Tweet, Trump during his campaign and now will receive countless hours of coverage on cable news shows and in newspapers across the country. Most days the traditional media no longer drives the daily political narrative, but instead it is merely reacting to what has occurred on social media.

According to Axios, newcomer Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is now second to Trump on total Twitter interactions defined as retweets and likes. This is why you recognize her name. There are other first-term Senators, but how many of them can you name? Unlike her, they have not mastered or understand the power of social media.  

Future political power belongs to those that understand how to use social media effectively. Twitter is the Daisy or Willie Horton ad of 21st century politics.   

###

Sign up today for Chad’s FREE newsletter to receive his weekly column and “A Whittle Bit of Commentary” podcast delivered to your inbox.

Is Social Media Addiction The Next American Mental Health Crisis?

There is a growing debate among Congress and the political pundit class on whether the Trump administration should consider breaking up the tech titans or if Congress should pass new regulations on Facebook, Google, Twitter and just for the fun of it, I’ll mention MySpace in this conversation as well. Yes, MySpace still exists. No, I don’t know anyone who uses it.

While freedom of speech issues on social networks and the possible breaking up of the Silicon Valley giants are both topics of great importance, the mental health issues that are being caused by social media use is equally as important.

Recent studies report a rise in levels of anxiety and depression among teenage and young adult users of social media. The BBC reported on a study published in the journal Computers in Human Behavior that found participants who said they use seven or more social networks were more than three times as those that use between zero-two platforms to have higher levels of general anxiety symptoms.

 A study in the Clinical Psychological Science journal with a sample of over 500,000 U.S. adolescents in grades 8-12, found that between 2010-2015 there was an increased rate of depressive symptoms and suicide-related outcomes among those who spent more time on social media and smartphones with these participants reporting more mental health issues than those that spent time on non-screen activities.

Researchers from Boston University School of Medicine’s Department of Dermatology discussed the growing trend of people seeking surgery to make their face be more appealing for selfies. In 2017, the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery found that 55 percent of surgeons mentioned having patients that were seeking surgery procedures due to social media. 

These are just some of the many recent academic and mainstream press stories on the growing trend of mental health issues due to social media use. However, none of this should come as a surprise.

If you have spent any time on a social media platform, then you have encountered someone that is obsessed with likes, swipes and follows. Or, maybe you are the person that is spending hours per day trying to become social media famous.

This is not healthy behavior as research and common sense continues to prove. We have a generation of fame-obsessed teens and college students that I am afraid are becoming only more infatuated with fleeting social media fame. This behavior could be not only bad for their mental health but their physical health as well. If you browse YouTube, you’ll find videos of teenagers trying very dangerous stunts in an attempt to go viral.

The next time Congress holds hearings concerning social media and freedom of speech on these platforms and regulation, I hope Senators will also hold the wizards of Silicon Valley’s feet to the fire concerning their highly addictive products.

It’s not all Mark Zuckerberg’s fault. Healthy behaviors should start at home and in schools, but it’s time social media companies do more to help turn the tide of mental health issues that their products are no doubt partially contributing to in young adults.

Helping teens and young adults have less mental health issues is something we all can give a thumbs up to.

###

Sign up today for the FREE Whittle Media Weekly newsletter to receive Chad’s weekly column in your email inbox, plus some of the most important media headlines and trends of the week.

CNN Should Rebrand HLN (Headline News) As A Conservative Competitor To Fox News

CNN recently announced they plan to no longer produce live news programming on sister network HLN, except for Robin Meade’s morning show and a few hours after her show goes off. The rest of the day will consist of taped programming.

The reason for the change from live news to taped programming?

Trump.

The “Cable news landscape is dominated by politics,” said HLN head Ken Jautz. He further explained to his staff that due to HLN’s focus on non-political stories, the network really could not compete in this current news and political environment.

While he did not say Trump specifically, at this point, isn’t the word politics just interchangeable with Trump’s name?

CNN is missing a real business opportunity by not embracing politics on HLN, specifically conservative Republican Trump politics.

If you like Trump or vote Republican, you watch Fox News. If you hate Trump, you can watch either MSNBC or CNN and get your daily fill of anti-Trump programming. One reason Fox News dominates both Trump hating networks in the ratings is that MSNBC and CNN split the liberal viewership.

I believe CNN’s parent company Turner Broadcasting is missing a big league ratings opportunity by not providing content for the MAGA viewer.

There is no way CNN would ever hire a pro-Trump host for a primetime slot. Their viewers would revolt.

However, HLN is a separate channel, and the past few years it’s really struggled to find its own identity. CNN should rebrand it as a Fox News competitor.

If HLN became Fox News-lite with a primetime line up of respected conservative commentators and reporters, it would give Fox News competition and would peel away viewers from the nation’s leading cable news channel. However, this would not happen overnight. It would be a long-term project because it would take years to establish trust among conservative viewers, but hiring someone like Ben Shapiro, for example, would go a long way in establishing trust.

Not only would this move provide CNN with millions more in revenue, it would also open the door for more voices and would make cable news overall stronger as viewers would have more options for conservative commentary.

Competition makes everyone better, stronger and pushes them to create better products. More competition in cable news would be a good thing for the viewer at home.

###

Sign up today for the FREE Whittle Media Weekly newsletter to receive Chad’s weekly column in your email inbox, plus some of the most important media headlines and trends of the week.

Background Material:

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/exclusive-hln-axing-most-live-shows-including-carol-costello-and-ashleigh-banfield/

Here's Where The Government Can Start If They Want To Break Up Silicon Valley's Tech Titans

According to media reports, the Trump White House has drafted an executive order that would open an antitrust investigation into the business practice of some of Silicon Valley’s most prominent firms including Google, Facebook, and Twitter.

The investigation would examine whether online platforms have violated antitrust laws and address online platform bias as well. President Trump has Tweeted his concerns about the potential political bias of some of the nation’s largest social platforms that all lean left.

The federal government has a mixed record of success when it comes to breaking up mega-corporations.

The most famous examples of the government successfully breaking up companies include Rockefeller’s dominant Standard Oil and the 1980s breakup of the AT&T/Bell telephone system. 

We are many years, court cases and Trump Tweets away from coming even a 100 miles close to a breakup of any technology or social media company.

However, for the sake of discussion and argument, here is where the federal government could start if they want to breakup some of the biggest tech titans in the world:

1.    Require Facebook to sale Instagram and WhatsApp. According to recent reports, Instagram has over 800 million users and WhatsApp has over 1.5 billion. Facebook has over 2 billion users. That is a lot of access to user’s data for Mark Zuckerberg to have.

2.    Require Google to sale YouTube. The video sharing website reports nearly 1.8 billion users each month, almost matching Facebook’s 2 billion users.

3.    Spinoff Amazon into multiple smaller companies. Possible spinoffs: Twitch.TV, Whole Foods Market, Zappos, and the list could go on.

Of all the tech companies, Twitter is in the best position to not be broken up because the company is smaller than their bigger rivals and the company has not invested as heavily into acquiring other companies. If you want to include Apple on the list, you could require the spinoff of Apple Music or not allow the company to produce original content, but only offer music and TV shows on their apps from third-party producers. 

As I said before, we are years away from any potential breakup even becoming a possible reality, but there is no doubt that the tech titans have more influence and control over our lives than prior oligopolies could even imagine.

Instead of antitrust lawsuits and breakups, a quicker and simpler solution may be to pass more regulation that protects user’s privacy and governs more how these firms operate.   

Either way, the days of Silicon Valley having a blank check (or unlimited Bitcoin for all of the tech-minded readers) to do what they want is quickly coming to a close. 

###

Sign up today for the FREE Whittle Media Weekly newsletter to receive Chad’s weekly column in your email inbox, plus some of the most important media headlines and trends of the week.